Top 7 Reasons Why Lord of the Rings the Theatrical Version is far BETTER than the Extended Version. Believe it or not this seems to be the minority opinion. But I feel strongly that the original Theatrical Version (TV) of LOTR is so much better in almost every way compared to the “Extended Edition” (EE).
The theatrical version of a movie is the one that was originally shown in theaters. Thus it is the cut of the movie that the studio thought would be best for the most moviegoers. An extended version or uncut version has scenes added that were filmed but cut out of the theatrical version.
approximately 2,019 years
No, there is no extended or director's cut version available for those movies. No official word was given as to why. Of course, given the number of years since these movies have been released, and the main series ended, it's not likely they will.
That's right, the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy is now on Netflix. No, not the extended editions with all the appendices and so on. You still need to go out and buy physical copies of those.
In order for the streaming platform to be able to add titles to its lists, it has to pay the studio holders to get the rights, and the more popular the film, the bigger the price – hence why big films usually don't last long, or come and go like Lord of the Rings.
The Fellowship of the Ring, 178 minutes theatrical, 208 minutes extended (228 with additional credits) The Two Towers, 179 minutes theatrical, 223 minutes extended (235 with additional credits) The Return of the King, 200 minutes theatrical, 251 minutes (263 with additional credits)
Jackson's reasons for cutting Saruman's demise were twofold; firstly, to pare down a film that was already testing the limits of how long a person can comfortably sit on a theater seat, and secondly because of the narrative flow.
The Lord of the Rings: Special Extended DVD Edition is a version of Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings film trilogy. These versions have new editing, additional special effects and music, and also more scenes and content than the theatrical versions. Each film is two discs, and two appendices.
All in all, the Extended Cut is a nice bonus to Fast Five but because of the minor changes, which can barely be seen during the action sequences due to the fast cutting, you are well served by the Theatrical Version. The Extended Cut is 73 Sec. longer than the Theatrical Version.
Originally Answered: What is difference between extended version and theatrical version of movie? The Lord of the Rings Extended Edition is a version of Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings Film Trilogy. These versions have new editing, adds special effects and music, and also more scenes and content in the movies.
Not every director's cut is superior to the theatrical version. The additional footage may be interesting to a fan, but in terms of the quality of the film, sometimes the theatrical version is really the best one to be had. Here, then, are five films where the theatrical cut was arguably better than the director's cut.
Here's what I found by Googling: The Fellowship of the Ring, 178 minutes theatrical, 208 minutes extended (228 with additional credits) The Two Towers, 179 minutes theatrical, 223 minutes extended (235 with additional credits) The Return of the King, 200 minutes theatrical, 251 minutes (263 with additional credits)
While the director's cut is seen as the more artistically pure version, the theatrical cut is often regarded as being the commercial cut – the studio-approved, corporate version released for mass consumption. The fascination with director's cuts is based in the desire to see more of what you love, or are interested in.
